If a director cannot disclose a conflict due to attorney-client privilege, what must they do?

A director facing a conflict of interest due to attorney-client privilege has a legal and ethical responsibility to maintain transparency in the decision-making processes of the community association. By excusing themselves from voting and stating the conflict, they ensure that the integrity of the board's operations is upheld. This action demonstrates accountability and fosters trust within the community.

Even when bound by attorney-client privilege, a director cannot simply participate in a vote without addressing their conflict, as this could lead to unfavorable outcomes for the association and potential legal repercussions. By stepping aside, the director allows for a fair evaluation of the matter at hand and ensures that other board members can make informed decisions without the influence of the conflict. This approach aligns with best practices in governance, promoting ethical standards and protecting the interests of the community association as a whole.