If a proxy-holder has not received instructions, how should they proceed?

When a proxy-holder has not received specific instructions from the individual who appointed them, voting as a general proxy is the appropriate course of action. This approach allows the proxy-holder to make decisions on behalf of the individual without explicit directions. General proxies typically have the authority to vote on any matter that arises within the scope of their representation, exercising discretion when necessary.

This practice is grounded in the principle that the proxy-holder should act in the best interests of the person who granted the proxy. By voting as a general proxy, the holder can interpret the intentions of the principal based on the situations and issues at hand, aligning their decision-making with the overall interests of the community or the individual being represented. In many community association procedures, general proxies are expected to contribute to decision-making processes, especially when specific guidance has not been provided.

In contrast, voting based on personal judgment or referring to past voting patterns may not adequately reflect the principal's wishes or the unique circumstances of current issues. Requesting guidance from board members could delay decision-making and might not be feasible in time-sensitive situations. Therefore, voting as a general proxy balances the need for representation with the flexibility required in the absence of direct instructions.