What recourse is available if an owner does not comply with a post-judgment payment order?

When an owner fails to comply with a post-judgment payment order, the appropriate recourse to ensure compliance is to file a motion to compel compliance. This legal motion requests that the court enforce its judgment and compel the owner to adhere to the terms of the order.

The essence of a post-judgment payment order is that it is a court mandate, and if the owner is not adhering to the payment schedule or terms set by the court, the other party has a right to seek enforcement through this motion. Filing a motion to compel can lead to further court action, including potential penalties for non-compliance, thereby reinforcing the authority of the court's initial judgment.

In contrast, the alternative options do not effectively address the specific situation of non-compliance with a court order. Bankruptcy protection would not directly resolve a post-judgment payment obligation, as it may simply delay payments or discharge debts under certain circumstances. Terminating all services immediately would likely create further legal problems, especially if it violates the terms of the contract or the association's governing documents. Lastly, voiding the judgment is not a feasible approach, as the judgment is an established legal decision that can only be overturned through a formal legal process. Thus, seeking to compel compliance is